RSP Science Hub
  • Register
  • Login

International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 3, Issue Special Issue ICARD-2021 3S
  3. Authors

Current Issue

By Issue

By Subject

Keyword Index

Author Index

Indexing Databases XML

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Editorial Staff

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

Peer Review Process

News

Digital Archiving & Preservation Policy

Editor and Reviewer guidelines

Strength Comparison of Bamboo and Steel Reinforcement in Mud Concrete

    MOHAMMED SAFIUDDIN Mohammed Ahmed Hussain

International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub, 2021, Volume 3, Issue Special Issue ICARD-2021 3S, Pages 86-91
10.47392/irjash.2021.071

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

The authors have designed mud concrete, by replacing cement with Over the past decade the price of construction materials like cement, aggregates, steel etc. have increased many folds, making it difficult for rural people to afford the cost of construction. The biggest problem of reinforced cement concrete (RCC) structures is corrosion of steel, as well as carbon footprint.  Locally available Red soil, Fly Ash and achieved an approximate strength 20 MPa meeting the requirements of IS 456:2000 as the minimum grade suggested for RCC structures. This research paper discusses the viability of using bamboo bars as an alternative to steel reinforcement bars in mud concrete.  In this research five mix design variations are designed as per IS 10262-2009, control mix (M20), 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% of partially replaced cement. Each variation comprised of locally available Red Soil (mud), and Fly ash in 2:1 ratio and lime as fixed 5%. Bamboo and steel bars of diameter 12 mm are used. Beam (Prism) of size 500 mm x 100 mm x 100 mm were casted with bamboo and steel reinforcement bars in single and double layers.  These were cured and tested in flexure at 7 and 28 days as per IS 516-2002.The results between the beams of all variations are compared. It is found that the beam with doubly reinforced bamboo bars of 50% cement replacement gave similar results to M20 doubly reinforced steel bars with the added advantage of elimination  of corrosion, decrease in self weight and non brittle breakage.
Keywords:
    Mud concrete Red soil Fly ash Bamboo Steel reinforcement
  • PDF (731 K)
  • XML
(2021). Strength Comparison of Bamboo and Steel Reinforcement in Mud Concrete. International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub, 3(Special Issue ICARD-2021 3S), 86-91. doi: 10.47392/irjash.2021.071
MOHAMMED SAFIUDDIN; Mohammed Ahmed Hussain. "Strength Comparison of Bamboo and Steel Reinforcement in Mud Concrete". International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub, 3, Special Issue ICARD-2021 3S, 2021, 86-91. doi: 10.47392/irjash.2021.071
(2021). 'Strength Comparison of Bamboo and Steel Reinforcement in Mud Concrete', International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub, 3(Special Issue ICARD-2021 3S), pp. 86-91. doi: 10.47392/irjash.2021.071
Strength Comparison of Bamboo and Steel Reinforcement in Mud Concrete. International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub, 2021; 3(Special Issue ICARD-2021 3S): 86-91. doi: 10.47392/irjash.2021.071
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 147
  • PDF Download: 451
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus